How to Determine What Comes Next
The world of work changed quickly over just a few months in early 2020, putting some business leaders in a state of limbo. Work must continue to move forward. But how? Managing a list of projects for stakeholders who all feel their projects deserve your full attention can be overwhelming. If it is your responsibility to figure out what should come next in the line of seemingly critical projects, four factors must be taken into consideration when tackling the problem:
- urgency
- cost
- unforeseen events
- resources & alternatives

Urgency
Urgency should be the main factor in deciding which project to address first, but first urgency must be defined. What are the risk factors? What is the cost of inaction? If the cost of not doing the project is detrimental to the business, then your only alternative may be to proceed. Allocate your resources accordingly and determine the time that will be required to complete these priority projects.
Cost
What happens when cost is a major factor? Utilizing a project management tool can help you determine how much a project will cost, but do not forget to compare that number with the cost of not doing the project. (There is always a not-doing cost.) Next, you will want to determine which projects can be completed in the least amount of time. Tools you can use making these decisions include activity-based costing, analogous estimating, parametric estimating, and three-point estimating such as PERT (program evaluation and review technique).
Unforeseen Events
Once you have answered the questions of urgency and cost, you will need to analyze how unforeseen events could impact active projects. Are upcoming policy or program changes planned? Has anything changed since the project was added to the queue? Does any of these scenarios change the urgency or cost of your projects? These are all questions that need to be answered while reviewing your open projects.
Resources and Alternatives
An activity-on-arrow chart can help you determine projects that might be connected. Getting a view into the connections will enable you to properly allocate resources and even assign projects based on specialization. This can free up other resources that you can allocate to unrelated projects, which helps reduce bottlenecking of projects in the queue. In addition, performing a critical-path analysis will enable you to map out each necessary task required to complete a project. This also uncovers project areas that may be dependent on others. Next, see if there are alternatives to completing the project as it was initially laid out. When in doubt — and if you do not have the bandwidth to perform these analyses — get a project manager.
Think through all the factors mentioned above and then consider the cost of outsourcing to a qualified project manager who is skilled in making such decisions. This may seem costly but spinning your wheels and getting stuck due to inaction can have higher price tags. Also costly is the risk of missed opportunities.
Putting your organization in the best position to remain agile and productive has never been more critical. When making project planning and management decisions, be sure you are not wearing blinders, and contemplate each perspective in moving forward with the work.



